|
|
|
|
|
|
by am1988
3241 days ago
|
|
|
> Obviously false. Justify this. The funding is legislated into place in such a way that they are not subject to the whims of a new budget. Removing it would require actually changing the law, which ensures that a government trying to do so is subject to scrutiny. That seems about as good as you can reasonably expect. > Don't pretend there are no other funding models. I didn't. Don't put words in my mouth. |
|
|
... assuming you want the news to be government-funded and, therefore, government-run.
Some of us see a problem in that.