>I especially like the spacers[1] for adding padding/margins
Looks just like the ones out of Bootstrap 4.
The "Embed Responsive" component appears to be a clone of BS4's.
Kanbasu's grid system looks much worse
>Widths are percentages represented by fractions. All classes are constructed like .w-{nominator}/{denominator}. By default you have halves, thirds, quarters, fifths and sixths.
>Note that only the smallest fractions are generated; for example .w-2/4 doesn’t exist when both quarters and halves are in the settings, .w-1/2 take over it.
...wait, what? Seems way more complex than Bootstrap. The responsive example is even worse:
.grid--center>.grid__item
Yikes, appears to be BEM in naming conventions only, doesn't include the specificity flattening that makes BEM so nice. So when I want to overwrite this I need to use the > combinator?!
It also appears to be totally lacking in JS components? Also missing many of the mixins that make Bootstrap more useful.
Looks just like the ones out of Bootstrap 4.
The "Embed Responsive" component appears to be a clone of BS4's.
Kanbasu's grid system looks much worse
>Widths are percentages represented by fractions. All classes are constructed like .w-{nominator}/{denominator}. By default you have halves, thirds, quarters, fifths and sixths.
>Note that only the smallest fractions are generated; for example .w-2/4 doesn’t exist when both quarters and halves are in the settings, .w-1/2 take over it.
...wait, what? Seems way more complex than Bootstrap. The responsive example is even worse:
Yikes, appears to be BEM in naming conventions only, doesn't include the specificity flattening that makes BEM so nice. So when I want to overwrite this I need to use the > combinator?!It also appears to be totally lacking in JS components? Also missing many of the mixins that make Bootstrap more useful.