|
|
|
|
|
by mrb
3246 days ago
|
|
"Put a few tons of carbon in the air pointlessly calculating hashes to mine coins" It's not pointless. Have you read the arguments in
http://blog.zorinaq.com/bitcoin-mining-is-not-wasteful/ ? It's not Ethereum-specific but the same logic applies. I feel I post that link too frequently, but people get too often mentally blocked on one technical detail (hashing) and fail to think about the big picture (renewables, jobs created, real utility of cryptos, etc). If cars with internal combustion engines were introduced today, would HNers complain its a dumb tech because it wastes 97% of the fuel's energy?[1] [1] 90% wasted moving 1.5 tons of metal and only 150 kg of useful cargo/passengers, and remaining 7% wasted mostly as heat/friction. |
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof-of-stake#Criticism
These problems seem fairly significant and unresolved. Thoughts?
Statistical simulations have shown that simultaneous forging on several chains is possible, even profitable. But Proof of Stake advocates believe most described attack scenarios are impossible or so unpredictable that they are only theoretical.
Any system that will eventually attain a $1T market cap probably can't have theoretical issues like this.