True! Also like one commenter said on the original article, if I have to share a file with 3 users, I will have to upload it 3 times and also there's the case of failed downloads.
Why are jumping from imagining a specific use case (1:N file share) failing (with little evidence that the product doesn't/can never recover from failures seamlessly) to calling into question the entire product?
According to yesterday's discussion they do have problems with handling failed downloads, they might want to fix that.
But if they would handle 1:N file sharing, they would risk being attractive to a lot of users they don't want (mostly those distributing in a copyright-infringing way)
Give the product a chance, imho.