|
|
|
|
|
|
by willstrafach
3239 days ago
|
|
|
> The call for proof on individual cases is, of course, a valid one In this context though, it is because the headline indicates that it is a proven fact. However, it is not, it is an assumption directly from Dotcom. I think there would be no issue if it were more clearly stated as an allegation. |
|
|