|
|
|
|
|
by grecy
3244 days ago
|
|
In all of your examples, a few hours or days later people could wander right into "ground zero" and begin cleaning/re-building or whatever. No so with nuclear. The impact is so much more serious when radiation comes into play. > Valdez Actually thousands of people were mobilized to contain the spill then clean up afterwards. It would have been a much better outcome if they didn't try to hide/downplay it for the first couple of days. |
|
Just because radiation causes different constraints on cleanup than oil on a large ocean or arsenic in the water table or issues in a space rocket means it is morally worse? That's the part I fail to understand, so long as the engineering continues to behave ethically behind all the systems in their design and construction and retrofit.