[chii]

> But certainly each individual person making decisions at Apple is a moral agent

I am not so sure that's true. If every agent is acting morally, then does the sum of those actions constitute morality? I think so.

Apple has some agents who are not moral agents. I suspect that all corps are like this.

[dragonwriter]

A “moral agent” is not “an agent that acts according to correct moral principles” but “an agent with the appropriate facilties that morality or immorality can be attributed to it”.

Apple certainly does have agents that are not moral agents (e.g., automatons like Siri), but for a different reason than you suggest.

[chii]

> the appropriate facilties that morality or immorality can be attributed to it

i m saying that the top brass making decisions are not acting as moral agents, because they don't feel the responsibility of any of the choices insofar as it increases the profit of the company.

[dragonwriter]

Not feeling responsibility doesn't make you not a moral agent (whether you feel responsible is a separate issue from whether you have the capacity which makes it sensible for moral responsibility to be assigned to you), and adopting “advancing the profit of the company” as a value that overrides all other concerns (and that one is responsible for), in any case, is making a moral decision (that is, one about morality, whether or not any other observer or any objective morality that may or may not exist would paint it as a morally correct.)