[eastWestMath]

Wadler's paper is an excellent piece of exposition that's us at the level of an upper-year undergraduate textbook. There's nothing condescending about referring a professional to a relevant paper in their discipline, but it is troubling when a professional won't even read over a paper.

[dmitriid]

It's troubling when people assume there's only one paper that a professional should read. Or that a professional cannot choose between papers to read. etc.

[KirinDave]

How did anyone imply this? A single free, reputable resource was offered, but many more exist.