|
|
|
|
|
by ausvisaissues
3245 days ago
|
|
> It's people like you who don't really care that millions have been imprisoned over a personal choice. Japan imprisons a very small percentage of people compared to the USA. Furthermore,it is a personal choice only if the other individual's choice does not have negative externalities. Yet, a casual stroll through San Francisco 's mission district would tell you that this is not the case. Who would have thought that drug use by the mentally unstable would result in a bad outcome... > You are an authoritarian, Perhaps. But when I compare the outcomes of Japan/ Singapore to that of the US, it is simple to see which model is the best. |
|
So we should ban every personal choice with negative externalities? There goes alcohol, twinkies, contact sports, driving, etc. It's a personal choice as much as anything else, so just estimate the cost of any negative externalities and cover that through taxation.
> Yet, a casual stroll through San Francisco 's mission district would tell you that this is not the case.
Of course you don't know any of those people and can't say for sure whether drug abuse is what lead them to the behavior that you disapprove of.
> But when I compare the outcomes of Japan/ Singapore to that of the US, it is simple to see which model is the best.
The model of inhumane prisons and death sentences? Actually the US has a pretty similar model to that already, so I'm not sure what your point is.