[compton_effect]

Not really. In the 60s we basically verified that certain rocket and engine designs work and that we could go beyond earth orbit. Creating a reliable, long lasting and reusable space rocket/vehicle is, in my opinion, orders of magnitude more difficult. Just look at the Space Shuttle failure as an example of trying to do space on the cheap. Also, remember it took about 5% of the US GDP in the 60s to put men on the moon. I believe in Musk but trying to make space cheap is just simply a difficult problem and one I wished we funded more.

[planteen]

A reliable, long use rocket is not exactly new either. Delta II first launched in 1989, 153 launches, 151 successes. There will be another launching this fall for JPSS-1.

[valuearb]

At a slower cadence and prices 3-4x that of SpaceX

[LoSboccacc]

Shuttle is not a rocket tho. check out Saturn V failures instead.

[taneq]

Eh? The shuttle absolutely was a rocket. The 'spaceplane' bit only kicked in for landings. On the way up it was 100% reaction mass driven.