Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by michaelmrose 3254 days ago
Since I presume you have verifiable backups of your pool couldn't you just remake the pool with the increased number of disks and copy back to it?
1 comments

Recovering from my current backup solution is expensive, the additional cost is not worth it.

Remaking the entire pool is also a hassle and incurs unnecessary downtime.

Additionally, not all data is backed up, which I will loose, as this is not important data, it's okay to loose during a house fire, but not just for resizing the disk.

Lastly, this operation would likely take a long time, days probably, I'd rather just be able to just ram in another disk and be done with it.

I had assumed you would have a second array as backup for the current pool ensuring zero data loss and easy backup. This would seem to be optimal. Remote backup is obviously a good thing to have too.
Such a solution is extremely expensive and inefficient for a home setup.
All things considered your house will probably never experience a major disaster remote storage has got to be many times more expensive.
Remote storage is on B2, several Terabytes, it's not very expensive, restoring however is.