|
|
|
|
|
by aphexbr
3243 days ago
|
|
"Isn't that the sort of thing that we have anti-trust laws for?" I might be wrong, but the way I understand it is that anti-trust relates to abuse of a monopoly position, not the monopoly position itself. So, if Amazon were doing things to force Nike to sell through them or get less money elsewhere, they'd be in violation. However, simply being so big that Nike would lose lots of money by not selling there is not. To put it another way, if I make a video and I decide that I don't want it on YouTube for whatever reason, Google aren't guilty of anti-trust if I then realise that I'm losing a lot of money by not having it there. They're simply the dominant player with the most customers. If, however, Google did something to reduce my revenue from other sources if I don't also have it on YouTube, they would be guilty of anti-trust. Flawed analogy and IANAL, etc., but that's my understanding. |
|
Such as buying up Nike products from other sellers so that way Amazon can still sell Nike whether Nike likes it or not?