[weberc2]

Your first sentence suggests that you disagreed with my previous post, but your rationale very much supports my point. Spending 125-250K on a job that only exists for a year is markedly worse than paying a comparable amount for a job that lasts many years.

[syshum]

I dont think the government should be paying for any job.

I disagree with this corporate subsidy, and I disagreed with the Recovery act

[weberc2]

That's fine, but my statement was neither for not against. Just observing that one appears to be a better bargain than the other.