|
|
|
|
|
|
by dankent
3251 days ago
|
|
|
I got better results: Input (original)
name:
the-northern-trifid-nebula-8499-1920x1200.jpg
type:
image/jpeg
size:
737.26 KB Output (compressed)
name:
the-northern-trifid-nebula-8499-1920x1200.jpg
type:
image/jpeg
size:
263.17 KB (64.30% off) I guess your original was more optimised than mine. A tool like this should definitely check to make sure it has actually reduced the file size and, if not, just return the original with a note that it couldn't make any gains. |
|
|