|
|
|
|
|
by Denzel
3253 days ago
|
|
Did you read my reply? You've arrived at the same number I posted in my TL;DR... $37.5MM. The point was never for her to come out ahead, just less behind. Why does this matter? I was simply pointing out that she achieved exactly what she wanted. Better optics. :) People commending her and commenting how amazing, how selfless, how fantastic it is that she donated all her proceeds to charity. Understand that her primary motivation in donating was the write-off, not charity. Otherwise, if she was feeling so chummy, why didn't she instead divide her almost 50% share among the employees that helped build her company? Hint: there's no write-off for that. |
|