| 1. This has some examples of articles the author feels are biased. > http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-benghazi-msnbc/ Good points, this quote was taken out of context. > http://www.snopes.com/orlando-shooter-was-democrat/ Good points, Trump was registered as a Democrat in 2001. Old registrations aren't a great predictor of current views. > http://www.snopes.com/is-facebook-censoring-conservative-new... Pretty fair, there is no primary source evidence either way, so the article concludes with "Unproven". This was not "opinion-heavy" or "mocking". > http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-armani-jacket/ Very fair, the claim was wrong on both counts. 2. This article ignores the executive editor's registrations as a Republican and Independent, and doesn't provide any examples of biased Snopes content. 3. This is a nearly fact-free article. The author seems shocked that Snopes doesn't hire unbiased people, but such people don't exist. 4. This article does not mention Snopes. |