|
|
|
|
|
by marcosdumay
3247 days ago
|
|
Whatever this article is talking about, it is not what most developers mean when they say "local state". For a start, one does not persist "local state", and this is a clear give-away: > state cannot be cheaply recomputed or regenerated like other live values The author seems to be arguing against a global state encapsulated into a tree of disjoint accessors. And his solution: > our programs become stateless logics manipulating a stateful substrate Is verbatim the FP-way of avoiding working on global state. |
|