Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by staticelf 3251 days ago
Come on folks, this is printed out on the use of the command and basically any site today does more intrusive telemetry.

I think they should ask people like Yeoman, but I don't think they deserve this much shit for such a small thing.
1 comments
shakna 3251 days ago
> and basically any site today does more intrusive telemetry

So the next version of Bash should have telemetry?

link
staticelf 3251 days ago
No but it's big differences in the projects. If Powershell would have gotten telemetry I would understand the objections.
link
shakna 3250 days ago
There is an earthshattering difference between a website, a place I go to let someone else run code, and a build tool I use to run code I write.
link
staticelf 3250 days ago
What? You run the code in the browser when it comes to javascript just as you run the .NET SDK. The difference is that the .NET SDK tell you that they send telemetry, how to disable it and what they store are not really any sensitive information. Most websites run code with the sole purpose of identifying you.
link
shakna 3250 days ago
JS engines are supposed to be sandboxed, and have limited APIs to draw from. Unless you use a jail, a local application can do just about anything.

The difference is expectation. I expect websites to run things I don't control. I expect a local application to behave in a certain way.

link
staticelf 3250 days ago
Well yes, and it behaves as expected, don't it? They are very open with what they are doing and you can build from the sources if you do not trust the binaries.

The point is, I understand why people dont want telemetry. I don't. I think they should ask before they do it, a lot of people are probably willing to share the data. BUT I also understand why they are doing it and I think they've done it in a good manner still.

You should also think about your expectations, one shouldn't have to expect that every site is trying to track you.

link