[abritinthebay]

for the purposes described in the comment - I was quite clear that a certain level you get down to quantum effects.

But for the context of the physical processes the OP was talking about those effects are not significant and so I excluded them.

[robotresearcher]

How about we replace the dice with Schrödinger's cat?

[abritinthebay]

Then we’re dealing with a very different thing and the conversation is therefore different?

[robotresearcher]

> Theoretically all physical processes are predictable, but in practice there is a limit.

So you defined away quantum effects as 'not physical', which most people would not agree with. How do feel about the theoretical limits on measurement accuracy that also negate your claim?