[dang]

Ok we added "ITER" at the beginning. If someone suggests a better (more accurate and neutral) title we can change it again.

[abefetterman]

More descriptive is Tokamak rather than ITER, since ITER is still going to have burning DT plasma in 2035 (at the earliest, according to article).

[dang]

So it should say "Tokamak fusion energy pushed back beyond 2050"? I'm worried that this will provoke more objections. The combo of highly technical + controversial makes it hard to get a title like this right.