[Bromskloss]

> For an open source project this is tolerable. I do wonder what enterprise users make of this constant UI change?

That's interesting to think about. What is the difference between the two types of users? Is it that the open source project is in no hurry and can accept a delay due to interface hassles? Is it that enterprise users are less capable and need a stable environment to function?

[StanAngeloff]

From my exposure to enterprise users, they are usually the sort of environment where hundreds, if not thousands, of employees work. Can you imagine how one "angry" of UI changes person in a team of a dozen scales set against that? With open-source users, it's more decentralised IMHO.

[corobo]

From my exposure to enterprise users their Gitlab updates will be wedged in the middle of a 2 year change control process and will jump over many iterations of design changes

[TeMPOraL]

If they were clever, they could structure the release schedule so that the enterprise customers which started with top navigation will renew when the top navigation is current again, and those who started with side navigation will renew when side navigation is on the mainline... ;).

[melicerte]

When I read your questions, I immediately though: Enterprise users need processes. Processes goes by documentation. If you have to change your documentation once every 6 months because the blue button on the bottom left is now yellow on the top right...