|
|
|
|
|
by therajiv
3265 days ago
|
|
Well, the data wasn't showing that the past few years were anomalous; rather, there were fewer high-magnitude earthquakes than expected. I don't think this has anything to do with being overdue for an earthquake. Most likely this is just because with events of low frequency (e.g. these higher-magnitude earthquakes were predicted to occur once every ~100 years by the linear model), large percent deviations from the expected value are more probable. Basically if you flip a coin 10 times you might imagine that 3 heads and 7 tails is pretty common, whereas 300 heads and 700 tails on 1000 tosses is comparitively extremely unlikely. |
|
Here's another plot, this time from UK seismic frequency, where again the frequency for high magnitude earthquakes seem 'under' the expected curve. Yet, again, these are 2 plots...
http://www.quakes.bgs.ac.uk/hazard/Hazard_UK.htm