Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by austenallred 3263 days ago
Consider that the alternative is all of the banking infrastructure that exists.

The energy that banks and their employees consume is orders of magnitude less efficient.

4 comments

Bitcoin does not replace more than a small corner of banking. It doesn't even include any loans.
lol not sure lending would work if the currency is always increasing in value, why lend money when it will be worth more if you keep it?
Sure, but that implies that all business and real estate transactions are going to remain using normal non-deflating money.
I would like to see any numbers on that claim. For example expenses / turnover or profit.

Edit: or cost per transaction.

For the volume of transactions they handle, it's really not.
This seems like an absurd false equivalence given that the banking infrastructure provides a much larger scope of services than Bitcoin offers.