[ahmedbesbes]

the aim of my post is not to make a prediction based on a standard alogrithm. my goal is to show that DL techniques make better predictions. What I wrote was a first draft of the algorithm, and I've not made my point yet, unfortunately. I'm working now on a better solution.

Could suggest improving the DL algorithm I wrote?

Thank you.

[williamsmj]

Again, you're missing the point. If your goal is to show that DL techniques make better predictions, you need to begin by answering the question "better than what?"