|
|
|
|
|
by renaudg
3266 days ago
|
|
> Interesting that you bring up an example linked to Switzerland, which isn't in the EU (it's not even part of the EEA). Despite that, it does have access to the European single market, something that some European bureaucrats are classing as 'impossible' for the UK post-Brexit. Let's wait and see. This is how Switzerland has access to the European single market : - It pays into the EU budget - It has freedom of movement for EU citizens - It implements many EU regulations, without having a say in them. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/07/20/how-much-do-non-eu-... This has been hammered on and on during the campaign : the UK cannot possibly end up with a better deal than what it currently has as a full EU member (with a number of tailor-made opt-outs bordering on unfair to other members, to boot) The issue is not with "some European bureaucrats", it is with some British people having difficulty coming to terms with reality at the moment. |
|
- It pays into the EU budget
According to the article you linked to, Switzerland pays far less than the UK for access to the common market. Time will tell what agreements are reached here.
- It has freedom of movement for EU citizens
Which I have no problem with. Oh, did you think that people who voted for Brexit were racist? Surprise!
- It implements many EU regulations, without having a say in them.
Again, from the article you linked to, it states that Switzerland has around 100 bilateral agreements with the EU in order to get access to the single market. Having a multitude of agreements allow a certain level of control over which EU policies to take on and which ones to avoid. Can read more about those agreements here:
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/count...
I do recognise that the bi-lateral deals with Switzerland took years to get ironed out, and I'm not expecting a quicker turnaround for the UK. What I predict is that we'll go for some form of soft Brexit where the divorce from the EU can happen gradually, which would be better for both sides.