|
|
|
|
|
by fdrdrive
3255 days ago
|
|
I think that's covered in the article - there's a passage on using `tf.scan` when the `tf.dynamic_rnn` abstraction won't cut it. `tf.scan` is more flexible than `tf.dynamic_rnn`, but provides a little more scaffolding for RNNs than using `tf.while_loop` directly. |
|
scan implements strict semantics so it will always execute the same number of timesteps no matter what the accumulator is (nan).
while_loop implements dynamic execution (quit once cond is not met) and at the same time allows parallel execution when some ops are not dependent on accumulator.
If you read the code for `dynamic_rnn` and contrib.legacy Seq2seq model you'll find while_loop. I have yet to see tensorflow library code using tf.scan anywhere!
Also, internally, scan is defined using while_loop. In my code, I find scan lacking in RNN and always have to fall back to while_loop.
Here is video of a talk by the RNN/Seq2Seq author himself:
https://youtu.be/RIR_-Xlbp7s?t=16m3s