|
|
|
|
|
by woodpanel
3262 days ago
|
|
Although I'm generally opposed to centralizing decision making, there seems to be proof that centralizing building restriction away from municipalities would help [1]. Restrictions on generating housing stock seems to be by far the biggest driver of income inequality and gentrification ("regulation accounts for 85% of the increase of house price dispersion from 1980 to 2009"). Not just gentrification within cities but the polarization of groups across a country. [1] http://idea.uab.es/jmarket/2016-2017/ANDRII%20PARKHOMENKO/Pa... |
|
This paper's decision to assume regulation is a scalar value, and renters as being "obviously" against rent control and rules about building affordable housing stock renders the conclusion of correlation pretty dubious, let alone causation.
Property developers are largely the ones fighting for cutting building regulations, not renters. Including regulations against building a set number of affordable housing units.
Income and wealth inequality was primarily triggered by union busting, untaxing the rich and offshoring, not how many parking spaces you were obligated to build in Los Angeles.