|
|
|
|
|
by shasta
5830 days ago
|
|
I agree with you that it's not even wrong, but I disagree with your reasoning. I think (2) is the natural intended meaning of the question. The problem I have is attempting to assign a probability to something that isn't reasonably known to be based on randomness. Did the questioner arrive at this statement by picking an arbitrary child and then declaring his gender and day of birth? Or did he pick his favorite child and declare his gender and day of birth? Would he have used this same question if they had both been born on Tuesday, or would have have picked a different distinguishing feature? |
|