|
|
|
|
|
by naasking
3267 days ago
|
|
> So such type systems might be able to prevent bugs, but in practice, they don't. Rockets might be able to carry humans up to space, but in practice they don't because only a small set of humans actually get to go. Isn't that a slightly absurd interpretation of "in practice"? Why these languages aren't used may have absolutely nothing to do with their technical merits. It's a myth that technical merits is the only consideration for language popularity. |
|