[sk5t]

PDF is used primarily for pre-paginated media and does not reflow text; if the PDF author wanted the pages in landscape orientation, or using some other paper dimensions, he would have specified that. Same goes for margins and the like.

[grogenaut]

Doesn't mean the author isn't wrong for my reading situation... Or isn't doing it just cause everyone else is.

[userbinator]

I think what the parent is trying to say is that PDF is not like HTML or text or other formats where the viewer is primarily responsible for a lot of the formatting --- in fact, a PDF page contains not much more than primitive instructions of the form "move to X, Y"; "set font to F"; "draw text 'Some text here'" (some pathological cases issue individual moves and draws for each character) --- so expecting all PDF viewers to be able to somehow "reverse-engineer" or "decompile" that set of low-level drawing instructions into more semantic entities like lines of text or even words in order to reformat the text is a little too much.

Anyone who has tried selecting text from a two-column PDF page will also quickly realise the nature of the problem.

[grogenaut]

I totally get that; however since these days a standard sheet of papers is no longer the main reading mechanism... I'm not sure it's the best layout for reading. My brother is a PhD and reads papers all day. He hates the two column format and paid for a reflowing reader. PDF is terrible on screens with different ratios than paper... Eg good computers and mobile. As I get older I use my plethora of giant screens to crank the fonts way up and sit back relaxed. PDF is terrible in that situation.

Just a thought... Maybe highly formatted PDFs for paper print shouldn't be the standard anymore. Eg my original point.

[vbuwivbiu]

ok, that's what the author wanted, but they're wrong. We are reading our text on computers in 2017 - we should be able to choose the format that reads best for us.