|
Adventured is right, about both feminism and censorship. I think the ERA would actually help men more than women. Right now it is much better to be a woman in america. Feminism has more than accomplished its goals of equality. Women can do anything they want, yet they also get these benefits:
If accused of a crime less likely to be convicted
If they hit a man far less likely to be charged with harsh domestic violence laws
If convicted, men get 60% longer sentences
If another Vietnam happens, women will stay home while men are forced to get killed, get their arms and legs blown off in war.
If they have a child out of wedlock they get free money from the government
If there is a divorce, they get custody 80% of the time. The reason men make more money is because on average, they have a higher iq than women (this is scientifically proven), because they have more natural drive than women, and because they have fewer emotional insecurities that prevent them from succeeding in the workplace. Feminism has achieved equality of opportunity in every regard. Today it is no longer about equality of opportunity, but equality of results. If feminists are going to fight for equal pay, regardless of merit, they should also fight for mandatory longer prison times, and mandatory higher conviction rates just for being women in order to match men. Or if they think things should be decided on relative merit of the individual, then they should quit whining about being women. Everybody has strengths and weaknesses. Find your niche, instead of trying to win at someone else's and then cheating because you came in second and wanted first. Edit:
As for the dogmatic downvoters, why don't you at least present some sort of rebuttal against these facts, instead of a media-ingrained fear downvote? |