|
|
|
|
|
by sigjuice
3272 days ago
|
|
Maybe rexec appeared first? And when rsh arrived later, they still kept rexec around? Perhaps they had a lot of shell scripts that contained "rexec" and didn't want to bother changing them to "rsh"? The actual reason is probably so mundane that maybe there is no accurate historical information on this topic. |
|