[yorwba]

From the article:

> “At first I didn’t see the nakedness or what she was wearing or the poses she was in, but then it began to sink in, what the ad was for, and everything just fell apart.”

This does seem to imply actual nudity, which makes it even more surprising they didn't immediately take it down when it was pointed out to them.

[qb45]

Immediately after nakedness it mentions she was wearing something.

Not 100% sure but I'm under impression that there are ways in the US to legally take down any CP. I haven't yet seen a single semi-legit website which allows it, even 4chan etc. Maybe I'm wrong, in such case just disregard this point - the rest still stands.