[x0x0]

If you want to support a company that pays employees $12.50/hour in sf, that's your choice. However, I don't support that, and the thing about employment at will is we can use how a potential employer treats employees to evaluate the employer.

> Neither are they responsible for paying you what you think is necessary for a comfortable life.

However, kindly don't misrepresent the contents of Talia's article and shift the goalposts from "comfortable life" to "remain housed and eat (and even see a doctor when necessary)." Because she's asking for the bare minimums, not a comfortable life.

[manigandham]

> However, I don't support that

No company cares because that's not how it works. Companies pay what the job is worth, then increase as needed if talent isn't available. Minimum wage work that anyone can do is not worth anything beyond that wage, regardless of where someone lives.

> she's asking for the bare minimums

No she's not. The job is worth a certain amount and deciding to accept and live with that is up to you. She was completely irresponsible by moving to an expensive area, getting a min. wage job and living beyond her means. 100% her fault. Then writing a strange article playing victim and calling out the CEO while including links to donate to her paypal account is about as ridiculous as it gets.

[jimmywanger]

> However, kindly don't misrepresent the contents of Talia's article and shift the goalposts

I have not misrepresented anything. Please point me to an instance in my comment where I have.

In addition, I'm not shifting the goalposts. She said herself that she had a car, an apartment, residence in the US, credit cards, and a college degree, and she wants more. I believe she already has the bare minimums, as she would be considered incredibly wealthy by about 80% of the world.

> Because she's asking for the bare minimums, not a comfortable life.

As I pointed out earlier, she wants a comfortable life. More importantly, in her article, she has not pointed out any negotiations she's done with her employer to ask for a raise. She is simply demanding more money, for no good reason whatsover. If you cannot demonstrate and communicate the value you're adding to the company as well as your willingness to leave, why would the company give you more money?

Also, this article seems like emotional blackmail that plays into the current zeitgeist of "tech is bad, you should give more money away". If she gave compelling value add arguments, she'd definitely get paid more. Right now she's only presenting her wants and needs - the company doesn't care.