|
|
|
|
|
by Smaug123
3282 days ago
|
|
I'm happy with that. It's an explicit design decision of C that there is a bound on the number of pointers. If I want to consider a Turing-complete variant, all I need to do is let pointers be of arbitrary size somehow, or let it have an "integer" type which really does hold any size of integer. |
|