|
|
|
|
|
by voice_of_reason
3277 days ago
|
|
Ok, the minority view was wrong in this particular case. Minority views were also right in some other cases. "Climate change denialism" - what's this? Is there any scientist out there who thinks that Earth's climate is stable in the long run? |
|
The parent post gave an example of a case where some credentialed scientists continued to dispute the HIV-AIDS link well after the balance of evidence was against them.
Many people would say there was a "consensus" on the HIV-AIDS link despite the continued skepticism of some scientists, and that this scenario has parallels with climate science.
Can you offer a counter example, where a holdout group of scientists who disagreed with consensus in their field were proved right?