Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sirkneeland 3280 days ago
The British had wanted to continue their period of rule in Hong Kong as the expiration date neared. It was a subject of negotiation between China and the UK in the 1980s. They wanted British rule or even some kind of joint administration. Even Thatcher (hardly a shrinking violet when it came to using force to get her way) couldn't get a deal to continue British rule in Hong Kong. China made it perfectly clear that the British would be leaving in 1997.

And so, for better or for worse, they came to an agreement in the Sino-British Joint Declaration. The British were essentially "consensually kicked out" (as the Brits might say, "mustn't make a fuss" ;) )

2 comments

It's worth noting that the Qing Dynasty ceded Hong Kong Island and Kowloon to the UK in perpetuity. The lease was for the the New Territories, without which it was generally accepted the city would not be viable. Hong Kong was (and still is) dependent on the Chinese mainland for imports of natural resources such as fresh water, so if the Chinese decided to play hardball the British had few options. And that's not even considering the possibility of China deciding to retake Hong Kong by force.
> Even Thatcher (hardly a shrinking violet when it came to using force to get her way) couldn't get a deal to continue British rule in Hong Kong.

Deng actually told Thatcher that if britain didn't leave, china would invade HK and unify by force. Thatcher actually asked the US if they would protect britain from china and we said no. And that was the end of britain's hope of keeping stolen territory.