Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rsheridan6 5834 days ago
The article claims, without evidence, that Nature and Science didn't publish Marshall because of ties with Glaxo. Even if that's true, there are a lot of other journals out there. Are they ALL in Glaxos pocket?

I doubt it. But they're all reviewed by his peers, who made a living by giving endoscopies and prescriptions to patients every year or so.

1 comments

Peer review is usually by scientist peers, and not professional peers. I doubt that most academic researchers in medicine were prescribing anything, really.
MDs do research all the time. Some MDs are also phDs. Marshall himself was a doctor/researcher.