Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zumatic 3277 days ago
No, it requires precedence to distinguish between (2 f (3 g 4)) and ((2 f 3) g 4)

> which is arguably how most sane engineers would write it

I'm always wary of this sort of statement.

1 comments

Um, what? How would you tell the difference between (f 2 (g 3 4)) and (g (f 2 3) 4)?