|
|
|
|
|
by thinkdifferent
5832 days ago
|
|
Everybody is suggesting some Austrian Economics books.
I don't think it's a good idea to start with something which is not mainstream in the academic world. I've read something about austrian economic, and it sounded good to me, but I know it's so easy to foolish a layman in any field with almost anything. If most academics today at top univesities and most nobel prize are not followers of the austrian school there may be good reasons. Better to start with the current state of the art and then read about less popular schools. |
|
The Austrians deserve respect if for no other reason being one of the "last men standing". The stagflation of the '70s should have put a stake in the heart of the neo-Keynesians, but the lure of "borrow, spend (and then get reelected)" is obviously too strong for most politicians (Keynes' advice that you pay back the borrowing in good items was at best naive, although upon rare occasion it has been followed).
Paying much attention to the officially popular in academia after watching the last 3 years of failure of their nostrums (and two decades in Japan) just doesn't strike me as a good use of the time of a beginner. Better to study a school like the Austrians that hasn't been falsified by the real world multiple times.