|
|
|
|
|
by projectramo
3283 days ago
|
|
Q: Are we conflating two issues? Is there a difference between the "sole developer problem" and the "lack of funding" problem. I mean, even if a project finds funding, does it follow that it will attract more talented developers? One way to distinguish the two issues is to look at for-profit software. In the cases where there is one primary developer, do they find it easy to keep the software going when the person retires? I ask this because, I think, beyond the very real monetary issue, there is a question of how development works. Do we need one very talented individual who does the lion's share of the lifting? |
|
It depends on what the funding is used for. Outreach in various forms (better documentation, presenting at conferences, a nicer website, moderating community venues from mailing lists to chat channels, triaging and grooming issues and PRs, etc.) takes time and effort (and therefore needs to be funded) as well.