This article BADLY needs source references otherwise all it rings of is FUD. I'm sure there is definitely references that can be found, but they are just sorely needed.
My thoughts exactly. Without references I cannot and should not take this information at face value, and cannot verify what the trade offs are for each clause. Some subgroup likely has an offsetting benefit for each subgroup receiving a setback.
Alas the lack of references and simplified message is likely highly effective at dissemination/virality/call-to-action.
Alas the lack of references and simplified message is likely highly effective at dissemination/virality/call-to-action.