Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by stickfigure 3282 days ago
As a consumer, I have (much) more trust that my interests are advanced by the EU than google.

The same people that brought you that idiotic cookies warning?

3 comments

Yes, the cookie notices are a bad implementation of a good policy, (informing users that they're being tracked.)
No. The cookie notices are the natural consequence of a bad policy driven by a good motivation. Well-meaning but stupid busybodies are cluttering up my world. See also: California prop 65 warnings.
Cookies don't imply tracking - that is just one use of them.
The EU law on cookies is specifically about tracking cookies, not first-party cookies.

See http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm#se...

And the EU cookie consent law doesn't apply when you're using cookies for most other purposes than tracking.
Do you not think that websites should alert users that they are being tracked?

I suppose the Guardian shouldn't alert people that the NSA listens to their telephone calls, either. (Because every spy agency does it?)

And the same people that are removing it.