Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bryanlarsen 3278 days ago
Exactly. It's not lethal because of state & community support. But state support for the employed is just a subsidy for the employer. It's better to have them be fully unemployed on state support so they can look for better jobs, improve their education or start a micro-business.
1 comments

> But state support for the employed is just a subsidy for the employer.

I'm not sure what you're talking about. You are not supposed to receive state support while being employed.

That's exactly what the EITC is. The main benefit is that it's a direct subsidy by the government instead of burdening businesses with paying people above what a free market demands.

From a political standpoint. It's also a lot easier for people to support. You have to work to receive it and it's been popular in both Republican and Democratic administrations. I can't speak for the current one. I don't think Trump has any core set of beliefs.

Over 60% of government benefits go to the employed. Walmart has built a whole business model around this, giving workers information on collecting government benefits, which is essentially a huge government subsidy for Walmart and similar businesses.