KDBX4 is a priority indeed, but we only have limited resources. We hoped to get it into 2.2.0, but it just wasn't possible. We really appreciate your patch and will make sure it lands in 2.3.0. It's not forgotten.
I understand, but I'm still disappointed. You all only needed to come to a decision on how you wanted to proceed with supporting the newer libraries required and I would have taken it from there. I'm not sure if you guys have even now come to a decision on that.
And it took a month before someone mentioned they would prefer if the KDBX 4 functionality was separated (and I do agree that it should be).
You could probably merge a similarly-sized patch into the kernel in less time...
I understand, but I'm still disappointed. You all only needed to come to a decision on how you wanted to proceed with supporting the newer libraries required and I would have taken it from there. I'm not sure if you guys have even now come to a decision on that.
And it took a month before someone mentioned they would prefer if the KDBX 4 functionality was separated (and I do agree that it should be).
You could probably merge a similarly-sized patch into the kernel in less time...