[dhfhduk]

Cool take on things, but not really fundamentally new as an explanation of evolution of cooperative traits. Models involving reputation and punishment have been around for awhile. Basically, once you introduce reputation and memory, together with punishment, cooperation becomes more viable as a strategy. It's even led to models of higher-order cooperation, of enforcing the enforcers, etc.

To me it seems like the paper isn't really offering a fundamentally new explanation of how these traits arise, it's just providing a sophisticated analysis of the dynamics.

[jballanc]

That cooperation is eventually selected for has been known for decades, but we didn't know how. Yes, there have been many speculative models describing how cooperation might arise, kin selection being among the earliest of these. Each of these mechanisms has some applicability and some predictive power (for example, kin selection is pretty good at describing cooperation in everything up to and including eusocial insects), but we've been missing the general mechanism that has predictive power across all domains.

In other words, the field of evolutionary biology today has its Newton's laws and Maxwell equations, but we're missing anything like the Standard Model. The authors of this work have been at this for a number of years. A sophisticated analysis of the dynamics is a key and very important step in beginning to develop a "grand unified theory" of evolution.

[aqsalose]

>To me it seems like the paper isn't really offering a fundamentally new explanation of how these traits arise, it's just providing a sophisticated analysis of the dynamics.

MIT Tech Review has often news about fascinating research, but one has to adjust for some amount of unnecessary hype.

[basch]

I remember reading this article 7 years ago http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/the_evolution_of_coo...