|
|
|
|
|
by BusinessInsider
3281 days ago
|
|
Can someone explain this to me? I'm only familiar with the current regulations and so the logic of this paragraph doesn't make sense to me: > Back in 2006, the regulations required teams to qualify their cars with race fuel-loads. The trade-offs were obvious – load the car up with fuel and you’d end up further down the grid, but with the benefit and flexibility of adjusting your strategy in the race. By contrast, qualify on petrol fumes and you had a good chance to be quick on Saturday, but you’d theoretically start the race with one hand tied behind your back. |
|
Qualifying laps are structured differently from the actual race itself, in a way that incentivizes putting less fuel in the car. Essentially, only the qualifying lap times matter, and not the advantages from having more fuel loaded. The obvious strategy is to put the bare minimum in the tank for qualifying, and more during the start of the actual race.
The new regulations forbid that strategy - you're allowed no more fuel to start the race than you had used to start the qualifying laps.