| Ah yes, a pithy phrase from Wikipedia that isn't backed-up at all by the sources. /golfclap Here, read through all these, and then get back to me if you think you're still correct. Perhaps this explanation will make it clearer? http://www.nzifst.org.nz/unitoperations/httrapps2.htm Something more scientific? https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252... http://aem.asm.org/content/early/2016/07/25/AEM.01737-16.ful... https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/mnt/drupal_data/... http://aem.asm.org/content/34/1/23.long https://www.mpi.govt.nz/document-vault/11042 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC91518/ http://digitool.library.mcgill.ca/thesisfile115866.pdf http://nfscfaculty.tamu.edu/talcott/courses/FSTC311/Textbook... http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/mfr452/mfr4521.pdf http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/ai407e/AI407E22.htm A Nice explanation of thermal processing food for canning: https://www.intechopen.com/download/pdf/40352 Textbooks? Principles of Microbiological Troubleshooting in the Industrial Food Processing Environment
See chapter 2.7 Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages
Pages 20-24, 187-188, 210 |
For future reference, you could probably just list that, and drop the attitude. You should also avoid dumping a glut of studies that you didn't bother to read, and that turn out to be irrelevant to the study; for instance the NCBI study you linked was discussing lysozyme's effect on temperatures and appears to contradict your statements, while the AEM ASM study (34/1/23) doesnt back you up as none of the trials they did went below 104 C, and it showed an inverse logarithmic relationship with decreasing temperature.