|
|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
3291 days ago
|
|
|
It highlights how popular press write science stories too. The article on absent cerebellum says 50% of neurons are there, clearly a smaller cross-sectional area is missing but this statement serves to increase the magnitude of the issue to the layman ... but in the article where it appears most of the cerebellum is present this key point on brain structure isn't noted; that would reduce the apparent magnitude of the injury. That may be happenstance, or otherwise unintentional, of course. |
|
|