Dude, he was talking about page content hierarchy, not the whole website hierarchy... You could've saved a couple paragraphs of ranting right there. SMH
Yes, he was talking about page content hierarchy. There are two kinds of content on a page: what I came there to read (like this comment), and everything else. Everything else is dedicated to helping me find my way to somewhere else. My point was that I don't read everything else, and so it doesn't help me (I know, it's a me-specific rant, but maybe I'm not the only one) no matter what page it's on; maybe it's not as important as what a particular page is about, and so the most important elements should be at the top (of all the pages).
> SMH
Sydney Morning Herald? G'day mate!